EVOLUTION OF LARGE-SCALE MAGNETIC FIELDS OF CHEMICALLY PECULIAR STARS
UDK 524.42 Ассоциации звезд UDK 524.3-126 Поиски UDK 524.3-13 Наблюдения UDK 524.3-14 Анализ и оценка результатов UDK 524.3-355 Спектр UDK 52 Астрономия. Геодезия UDK 53 Физика UDK 520 Инструменты, приборы и методы астрономических наблюдений, измерений и анализа UDK 521 Теоретическая астрономия. Небесная механика. Фундаментальная астрономия. Теория динамической и позиционной астрономии UDK 523 Солнечная система UDK 524 Звезды и звездные системы. Вселенная Солнце и Солнечная система UDK 52-1 Метод изучения UDK 52-6 Излучение и связанные с ним процессы
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
We studied the magnetic field of chemically peculiar stars in the young Orion OB1 association and in other five older clusters. We have found new evidence of the validity of the relic origin of the magnetic field. In the Orion OB1 association, the magnetic field values and the occurrence frequency of magnetic stars are systematically higher than in older groups. There is no magnetic field generation during the life of a star on the main sequence. The observations were carried out using the 6-m telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences. We studied the magnetic field of about 80 stars. More than 1000 spectra were obtained with the circular polarization analyzer on the BTA Main Stellar Spectrograph.

Keywords:
stars: magnetic field, chemically peculiar
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Bagnulo S., Landstreet J.D., Mason E., et al., 2006, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 450, 2, p. 777

2. Blaauw A., 1964, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2, p. 213

3. Brown A.G.A., de Geus E.J., de Zeeuw P.T., 1994, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 289, p. 101

4. Chountonov G.A., 2016, Astrophysical Bulletin, 71, 4, p. 489

5. Hümmerich S., Mikulášek Z., Paunzen E., et al., 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 619, id. A98

6. Mestel L., 2003, ASP Conf. Ser., 305, p. 3

7. Moss D., 1989, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 236, p. 629

8. Panchuk V.E., Chuntonov G.A., Naidenov I.D., 2014, Astrophysical Bulletin, 69, 3, p. 339

9. Romanyuk I.I., Semenko E.A., Yakunin I.A., et al., 2013, Astrophysical Bulletin, 68, 3, p. 300

10. Romanyuk I.I., Semenko E.A., Moiseeva A.V., et al., 2019, Astrophysical Bulletin, 74, 1, p. 55

11. Romanyuk I.I., Semenko E.A., Moiseeva A.V., et al., 2021a, Astrophysical Bulletin, 76, 1, p. 39

12. Romanyuk I.I., Semenko E.A., Moiseeva A.V., et al., 2021b, Astrophysical Bulletin, 76, 2, p. 163

13. Romanyuk I.I., Moiseeva A.V., Yakunin I.A., et al., 2023a, Astrophysical Bulletin, 78, 2, p. 152

14. Romanyuk I.I., Moiseeva A.V., Yakunin I.A., et al., 2023b, Astrophysical Bulletin, 78, 1, p. 36

15. Romanyuk I.I., Yakunin I.A., Moiseeva A.V., et al. 2024, Astrophysical Bulletin, 79, 1, p. 95

16. Schneider F.R.N., Ohlmann S.T., Podsiadlowski P., et al. 2019, Nature, 574, 7777, p. 211

17. Semenko E., Romanyuk I., Yakunin I., et al., 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515, 1, p. 998

Login or Create
* Forgot password?